it`s the balance sheet stupid, page-79

Playez old mate: Yr Post below requires an answer:
""How can the fortunes of mastitis be debated before the details of the trials are disclosed ? Who conducted the trials & where ? Was it the veterinary school at the the University of Adelaide or farmer Jo & a couple of mates ?
The only thing disclosed by either party so far are the two pathologists and that the trials were overseen by POH .
But who did they oversee ? If the trials were conducted by the above university for example professionals can be assured that the correct protocols , methods & procedures were in place .There'l be no traction with the veterinary or related pharmaceutical industry until the detail is out !"" Ends

And here are my thoughts on this subject:

it seems to me you what you are missing in your view - is that these trials are Commercial In-Confidence, they are not university studies; MMA and POH are not trying out for a doctorate....they are running trials to prove up the efficacy of the science that has been available in peer review form for over 30 years now.

As it says on their website this is not new science, there is a plethora of science about this, except this time we are using TPM to drive it.

Surely that's what you are invested here for: POHs TPM!

If you don't believe in TPM or that it works ..why do you hold the stock?... its hard to imagine someone has an investment in a coy that is based on TPM, and then questions repeatedly where is the science?

POH have anncd they are talking to Multinationals about selling the world wide licence for TPM Mastitis Management...so do you think that Novartis (lets say) will ask them to go and get it University validated before they do a deal?? I dont think so either. That's why POH and Novartis employ PHD credentialed scientists; they don't go back and ask permission from some University to check over their trials and report back on them.

Ill bet you were not aware that Novartis Animal Health for example have their own private farm outside of Sydney where they do all of their testing. These products are worth potentially 100's of millions of dollars, so they don't want to tell or tipoff other coys about their IP by publishing it do they?

...but CSL do this or that,I hear you say?... I can tell you they don't put anything out until the invention has passed Patent Acceptance which is 18 months from the time it is lodged, before its published, anything that escapes into the public domain during that first 18 months would invalidate the patent

So clearly , POH / MMA / Novartis or whoever, cant divulge anything until patents are processed.

I hope that might clear up your concerns here

All the best KC