how can the company do this to shareholders, page-19

Hi FT

Thanks for that. you make a very good point about if the company had not made any announcement and just released the final agreement into the market and the price tripled to 6(or 10) cents and that may have been that. That could well have been the case. As it is, news has had a chance to spread, interest created and new buyers have come in to create support and we are sitting comfortably(I hope) in the mid nines.
Has anyone else thought that this has been very carefully orchestrated? I don't mean in a bad way, just that if this is the big one, the culmination of years of work and I have no reason to doubt that it is, then wouldn't it be logical to manage this company building period. It seems logical to me that expert advice would be sought by say, brokers or someone who has an intimate knowledge of the markets and its moods. Sure, the law says that all relevant information must be released to the market but there must be many ways around this, eg. leave one dot off an "i"(figuratively speaking) and things are technically incomplete.Whatever it takes to get the price up and the market primed then bang, we can double or triple from there. That's how I would do it anyway, make the punters sweat a little to get the best result for the company rather than release an announcement prematurely and we then end up with a share price of only 10 cents. This would put pressure on the company to let Kronos buy in too cheaply, if that is what is going on,
As frustrating as it is, I am happy to hold for as long as it takes to get the best deal for all of us.

cheers