Firstly, generally when I count I don't do it 4 days into the future. If you want to go back 5 days from my post the number would be 15, not 3.
To answer your question, in that same five day period I posted four times on ESG including the post you have replied to, one of which I TOU'd myself as I felt it was a bit rude to you.
You see Buddy, I'm not here to say "I told you so", I'm here to listen and learn and share ideas. You can't have a failure with a shared idea. There are no failures on a forum. I do not ramp. I back my statements with reasoning. That would make my 'ramps' ideas or thoughts. I do not need reassuring of my investment decisions as I take the time to research thoroughly before I purchase. If something goes pear shaped I either sell, or put more money in if it is fundamentally sound.
There are no failures in predictions. There will be a GSA, LNGN or a takeover. The only guesswork is in the timing. Is there something wrong with hypothesizing when nobody actually knows the info without dealing on the inside? Is there blame actually being laid on anyone? Am I saying, 'Hey Buddy, stop posting you're pushing the shareprice down and stopping GSA's and a takeover with your postings'? Of course not, although you'd probably like to think so.
I just can't work out why some people bother pretending they hold stock when they have nothing decent to say about it. Especially if all they say is holier than thou rubbish chastising any train of thought that goes outside the box by a millimeter. Find a post of yours that had some positive technical or fundamental input and get back to me, I'll be curious to see what you wrote. Why do you post on ESG, other than to keep everyone's ideas in check? Is it to learn or to share or simply to talk yourself up?
ESG Price at posting:
71.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
