Your discussion here with Natashia is a classic example of high farce. It also worries me in relation to you being a "Moderator"
It started with Natashia's comment (Post #100314) that the disclosure of partial IP addresses was causing more problems than it was solving and it might be better if HC was to do its own policing of multi-nics and not leave it up to the rabid masses to control themselves.
Your response (Post #100320 - in reply to msg. #100314) was a complete non-sequitur clearly showing that you had not understood what she (I'm assuming that Natashia is a female) was getting at.
Natashia then tried to clarify this (Post #100324 - in reply to msg. #100320) by explaining the intent of the original post. To me, the intent of her original post seemed obvious but it was certainly made more so by this post.
I am completely confused by your subsequent response (Post #100335 - in reply to msg. #100324) and I quote:
"Not a nice thing to say.
Don't bother to further comment.
Gerry"
Can you please explain to me what it was about Natashia's attempt to clarify her original post that you deem is "not nice" and why you seem to be so upset about it that you have become rather offensive in your comments? If this was SS the mods would have given her three days in the cooler (loss of posting rights) for this "indiscretion". This is one of the reasons I'm concerned about how HC is going to run moderation.
You are apparently a Moderator on this site and so far you have completely failed to inspire any confidence (for me at least) in your ability to undertake these duties.
Oh and by the way, what exactly are the duties, responsibilities and limits under which a "Moderator" will act?
