macro20,
the victorian governement has long published literature on coal and qualities of coal throughout the state. they are available, just contact the DPI or check your state library. i would be forth coming with more information, but i am not here to assist those who continual to make farcial statements and try to demonise those who present facts.
Also the % content of the coal emmission and grades in the ground when mined and burnt are applicable to the burning process and amount of filteration done, so without putting those in your statement which can be gained from the NGERS annoucements power stations makes that response can not really be forthcoming. Further these are always changing as when you dig the content does change, some open pit ore bodies vary more than others but generalistations can be made.
MY point is this, KOS GALTOS mocked MNM for having high sulfuer content, thats your CEO.
My response is, COLDRY is not equipped to be used in these same power stations in victoria.
ERGO, stick to your own back yard.
Glad you want to clarify this but.
Regarding blending, MNM and just as capable to supply low % feed stock as are Coldry, but in reality this wont happen.
You can not be serious in comparing the Victorian governemnt backed MOU and ESI!!!? I dismiss it because one is a small company that has done nothing in essense and once is a government? i am amazed you cant differentiate between the two.
ESI have talked to india, vietnam, china, indonesia, who else have i forgotten, poland. and nothing has materialised. ski trips aside. So you tell me why i should put and credence on these fluffy annoucements.
Loy yang pay nothing for coal now, they own the site, why would they pay for coldry!? you tell me? please dont reply to this if you cant include technical limitations.
BUT you all continally digress,
L8TR quoted engineering works have started, SP3 said this is misleading? no comment made by others on this.
L8TR quoted a cost blow out by HRL, this has been shown to be false, again no comment made by others.
if you wish to get continual free education then you need to be fair to all and not just go me because i am not here to ramp. sorry but i dont need to justify my holding at any price.
next time you or anyone ask be prepared to only get these comments in return as you guys are just not addressing the central issues.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ECT
- hrl cost blowout
hrl cost blowout, page-53
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ECT (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
-0.001(25.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.515M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.3¢ | $297 | 79.57K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
55 | 17643627 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.4¢ | 14484105 | 27 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
52 | 17581277 | 0.003 |
26 | 16475353 | 0.002 |
11 | 17969024 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.004 | 12723591 | 25 |
0.005 | 4502313 | 27 |
0.006 | 5972900 | 12 |
0.007 | 2628334 | 7 |
0.008 | 252213 | 3 |
Last trade - 15.59pm 19/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ECT (ASX) Chart |