IMO, direct comparisons to STB and FMJ here are not appropriate given that STB's deposit is near surface, FMJ's is likely 500-700m deep whereas TRH's is 1.8 kilometres deep!!! (slide 11, April 2010 presentation - wonder if depth was deliberately omitted from latest presentation...??)..also still an exploration target as with FMJ, STB has a resource
At 1.8km deep, costs for TRH will be substantially higher than any mining of FMJ or STB's deposits (on depth).
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TRH
- the next fmj
the next fmj, page-19
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)