imminent, page-99

Classic Magix!, as painfully repetitive it gets it is still worthwhile to have both sides of the debate and the only real way to silence a downramp is to provide correct information - great work Magix.

Will throw in my 2c as well - the premise of firsova's initial post was twofold - 1] that the delays of the ponds are related to the contractor and 2] that some impropriety has occurred with a large amount of companies money being spent on a directors related company for questionable results.

No 2] surely now put to bed - looking at the photo's it seems an entirely professional job being done in an efficient way. Was impressed they used tunnel plumbing to go under the roads , and have surface piping where allowed rather than costly trenchwork.

No 1] no - one addressed as the information is widely known - the delays are unrelated to the actual construction of ponds.

So well done forum I reckon - all good. Very questionable the motives in bringing such a misleading argument tho.