cate blanchett, page-120

  1. 8,527 Posts.
    Rollo -

    you haven't even touched on one name of any of the world's top scientists who actually strongly disagree with the falsities in the need for carbon tax arguments the left wing media conveniently ignore them too.

    Gillard will only listen to those who kow-tow to her views.
    This, in a PM supposedly wise, onjective, and governing for all, is reprehensiblely skewed to severe bias, born either of deliberate deceit, or sheer ignorance.

    Paid or not, Blanchett and Caton rush in and spruiked on the side of a theory they know nothing about. To feel good.
    Did they stop to consider the Australian public and their welfare? No.

    Their behaviour in participating in propoganda support wi5thout the required reserach from both sides is then reprehensible. By all means stand up if you are fully qualified to argue the other side of a debate. If you are
    not, you're just guessing, or fiddling recklessly with the truth to suit your political mates.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.