[i]thanks for balancing out the "bleak" and defamatory picture busily being painted by some and providing some background and current data that some may not wish to take on board[/i]
Careful with your wording there, any defamatory content would (should) have already been moderated. If any of the information presented is inaccurate, it should be rightly moderated as well, but from what I can see nobody has contested the facts (except that maybe it was a different Peter Boonen in that article).
If you see any defamatory content, you should alert the mods to it.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?