professional wolf, page-14

1. Negative views are welcomed
2. Lets stick to the stock
3. A forum cant move the sp
4. Never fall inlove with a stock

We all know never fall in love with a stock and never invest more than you can afford to lose, however nobody ever wants to lose even if they can afford it.

So when the same negative views are constantly expressed its almost like telling a mother her baby is ugly. You just dont do it. Theirs no need for it.

Express your opinion then move on. If any individual poster request further explaination then reply. If someone posts something unfactual or new, then counter reply.

This might seem onesided or unfair to people with a negative view, but lets be honest how many upramps do you see? Not many either. A blatant and constant upramp with no factual basis or low content will quickly be put in its place by other HC members and even moderated if blatant enough.

The forum self moderates to a degree. Most people that step out of line are quickly made to realise it is unacceptable. They get the hint and move on.

Their is always email or other methods to continue discussions with interested parties.

Perhaps daily posting limits should be considered. Limit people(+/-) say 5posts. Enough to make a post and then reply to discussions.

The most important thing is to treat each other with respect. Nobody wants to be told they are stupid, or inexperienced. If you want to help teach or save someone then do it proactively and with dignity.

People can profit from rising or falling sp, but in INT case shorting is near impossible in volume. So the only real option is a LONG position or nothing.

Its easy to be critical of INT. Its sp history speaks volumes. But its a small company in the speckie category. All the general speckie risks are here and known.

Their may even be some specific risks to INT, but no obvious ones that I can think of.

They are debt free and finally starting to earn revenues. Possibly even cash flow positive. Cash is minimal but expenses keep coming down and project costs generally have an upfront amount in the contract. Also they have EnergyMad to sell if they chose.

Debt via another con note would be a possibility.

I agree a CR is also possible, but at this stage I dont see it. It would be a catch 22. Right now growth is slow (unfortunately), so funds aren't really required.

If funds were required to expediate growth, then the payoff is new bigger and better contract and a fast turnaround.

Personally im expecting a slow and steady transition into profit, one development at a time. So no need for a CR. However as melua states any CR would be at a discount to current sp, which would be horrific. You'd guess 0.2c if done today.

Good luck with your holdings. Try to make money but if its no longer fun then just move on. Thats what managed funds are for.