Just to let you know, there is pretty much no debate among climate change scientists, the media may make it out to be so but the more time goes on the more science supports the theory.
From the Garnaut report "Where dissent is found in the community of scientists with genuine climate credentials, it is among a small number who argue that the effects of increases in greenhouse gases are small compared with other sources of changes in temperature.
But a larger number of alternative views can also be found on the other side of the debate. There are reputable scientists who argue that great changes in climate are triggered by lower greenhouse gas concentrations than the mainstream science suggests."
Snuff "I5 is a deliberate lie to fool the simple minded or those who really do not know science." -
You're using the argument that is commonly used against sceptics and it doesn't make sense, the science absolutely supports the theory. Have you seen the Garnaut report or are you mainly reading about whatever agrees with you?
