You see Mr. Bolt is having trouble getting an Alarmist scientist like yourself to go on his show, to debate with a Skeptic scientist. Any Skeptic scientist.
This is the crux of the matter. In all the time I've been reading Moby's and BB's posts they have not put forward any individual, qualified scientists who believe in AGW. This is why they are still stuck with Al Gore who not only won't debate, he refuses to take questions from the floor after giving a highly paid lecture. His Inconvenient Truth has been shown to be wrong on many points in British courts.
The pro AGW camp is comprised of GROUPS of scientists who multiply their official line by the number of members and claim "The Numbers". To prove their case they quote each other. This is a circular argument! The sceptics, on the other hand, are individuals who have the courage of their convictions and put themselves up for criticism by every alarmist such as those here who go to great pains to denigrate them personally and professionally. I trust them specifically for this reason. Prof Bob Carter is a typical example. He was doing "climate" type research long before the term "climate science" was coined. He is eminently qualified to speak.
Do a search "father of climatology" and you will find Reid Bryson. He was doing this research before even I was born. He is a sceptic!
Moby could not possibly be a scientist. His logic skills would never get him through through uni.
Again I call on Dilbert to present this as only Dilbert can:
