are you ready to rumble?, page-18

skol, take your pick, but for starters have a look at one of your recent posts where you asked what is different between 1981 and now, then look at my response.

on a separate note let me respond to your last post:

------------------
Fact: Gold isn't going to the moon because if it was worth that it would already be there. Gold's topped out, look at the shares, there's the clue.
------------------

when you say things like "Fact" it comes off sounding a bit silly, since your track record on gold forecasts is about as good as michael pascoe's.

personally i don't think gold is going to the moon, but i think it still has further to go. i'm pretty sure back at $300 gold you would have thought $1,500 sounded like the moon to you, so don't be surprised when people want to point out that your content is low-value at best.

and here's the good bit, in your other post a minute ago (#6807233) you said:

"Anyway, even if I had been I'm not offering investment advice."

and in your next post you said.....

"Even as the dollar has fallen, gold's gone nowhere, should be a hint to those with excessive exposure to reduce it."

so, you don't want to offer investment advice, and then you go ahead and do it anyway. hmm. i'd say if you ever had the chance to manage a fund it would have been sunk in the first year as you don't appear to know the first thing about economics