Having read all the evidence provided here and seen all the videos, I pronounce grahod the winner.
Too much hard evidence supporting the facts that an aeroplane hit the Pentagon. A pilot eyewitness, he knows what an aeroplane looks like, other eyewitnesses backing up exactly what he says.
All witnesses report an aeroplane, some correctly identify it as American Airlines, others say it is a passenger aeroplane(most Jo public can't identify the different aircraft type, ie 737, 757, 767, 777, A320, A330). Guess what, the pilot identifies the aeroplane type and the airline.Correctly identifies it impacts before the Pentagon, see the light/telegraph poles.
The US reporter, who they try to debunk, clearly says he is on the exit, yet as they try and debunk him, they show him way back down the road and show some obscure trees. Yet if you look at the overhead view provided in mowibbles link, you can clearly see there are no trees between the exit and the Pentagon.
The photos of the wreckage provided by mowibble just blow meerkat's theory out of the water. All components are easily identifiable to someone who has anything to do with airliners. Maybe not so identifiable to a Monday morning quarterback.
Grahod, well done! Meekat, you have had the wool pulled my friend.
