down , down down, page-60

Thanks Agent, exactly as I have been stating all along.

This form of misleading media attention is really wearing thin. It displays (again) how biassed and opportunistic it has all become.

Why the natural disaster death toll is even used in the same story is beyond reasonable comprehension. They are two totally seperate issues and it is only being done to create attention grabbing media content. It wouldn't be news to state there was a plant failure caused by a 1:1000 year natural event that resulted in 3 fatalities unrelated to radiation. Much better to mention 10,000 deceased and 15,000 unaccounted for...that had absolutely noting to do with the reactors.

It has nothing at all to do with reality it is simply the ongoing media attention grabbing by twisting information to suit the medias and others (against nuclear) purposes.

Sentiment will revert back to reality and when it does look out.