sandfire drill on boundary, page-15

Empire, not the subject I would normally pursue but as you are getting tired of the sniping I will have one more snipe, only to correct your post.
Yes, page 2 and page 1 quotes by you were released by the company, these were interpretations made by Southern Geoscience.
In a report by RNI on the 28 February 2011 on the first page the following was stated.
Southern Geoscience has noted that the high conductivity of DG_C3 indicates the source of the anomaly is either massive sulphide and or graphitic shale. The company is not aware of any reports of graphitic shale in the DeGrussa area.
When reading the full report any reference to ?Company? is listed as (RNI or the Company) .
I formed the opinion that RNI was telling readers they did not know of any shale in the Degrussa area, and I was only drawing attention to other exploration companies statements that they have found shale in drill holes in the area.
Now that you have got me going you may want to do some research on reports from RNI on their copper soil sampling over their claims. Match the results up on the ground with the anomalies also reported.
I have always had a lot of faith that any conductor located that has surface copper indicators would be a very promising target. Line up DG_C1, C2 and C3 and see if you can come to the same conclusion as me.
Opinion on what price RNI should be in the market is left to the punters.
RNI have some genuine targets that do have copper surface indicators and anomalies pointing to a chance of success. Good Luck to them and you as a shareholder.