Hi Iam - from your post;
"Hi prosperman
What advice did you receive 5 days before the duster?
Anatol mentioned something similar:
'I lost my belief that there was any chance of gas in Artemis, this was exactly after we had a meeting with JH and other directors in Melbourne.'"
I ask -
- ( and maybe these posters should read HCs disclosure section in detail)
- Are these allegations not drifting into serious legal territory here with inferences of inside information, misleading information, lack of disclosure and even the possibility of insider trading ( if investors were indeed privy to sensitive information that was not available to the general market....) if these claims are indeed genuine and able to be substantiated?
Prosper - you also state _
" As I have stated I wish Meo well as all investor take risks deserve results "
I disagree wholeheartedly - simply because an investor takes a risks does not mean that they deserve a result! Some risks are tolerable ( imo buying Meo @18.5c is almost risk-free ) whereas other risks are simply gambles which do not "deserve" results....luck maybe but never confuse luck with a deserved result!
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?