MMX murchison metals ltd

pk is not useless ! crunch time for sino imo, page-5

  1. 1,506 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 52
    excuse my ignorance matt747 have been reading all the posts and trying to get my head around the situation of mmx.
    so what your suggesting is buy out mmx for a bill.


    is it possible or viable for mitsu and sino to own 50/50 of jhep and 40/40 of rail in return for free funding 20% of rail to mmx.

    6 bill for rail development at 20% is 1.2 bill free funded to mmx.

    what is 20% of the rail worth up and running to mmx, would it be a viable outcome for all parties involved.

    so mmx let go of jhep for 1.2 bill for a 20% stake in the rail.

    would mmx holders rather get bought out or would they rather own a 20% stake in the rail link with on going revenues.


    mitsu secures 50% from jhep and 40% rail link
    sino secure 50% jhep and 40% rail link plus makes weld more viable and they both keep control of Midwest.

    cost to both party's would be around 5 billion each


    either way if mmx disappears to dust it would still cost other partys around 10 bill to get both projects up and running, why not sacrifice 20% stake in rail to mmx for holding the license to the project and get the ball moving asap.
    from what i have read its cost 600 mill to get the rail to this stage already so essentially pay another 600 mill to take it of , mmx and nsw gov hands, secure yourself jhep and midwest.




 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.