going forward, page-17

SRF;
I can't believe you are defending Mr Hamilton by writing the below statements:

'When EDM realised that they are had, they terminated the agreement and wanted to ask for the fees back. Unfortunately, the agreement is legally binding and the fees are not refundable'
and
'EDM was basically fallen victim to the 'loan for upfront fee scheme', which was generally refer to as the Nigerian Scam or 419 scam (Negeria panel code 419). But this is a very sophisticated one to the asinine'.

Give me a break - Mr Hamilton should carefully manage the shareholders money and seek legal advice.

Scam is a scam, a fraudulent business scheme (deprive of by deceit).

I'm really confused because I don't understand how a scam could be legally binding. Scam (a fraud by AGS) might be reported to the adequate institutions and the criminal investigation should be initiated.

Even Madoff was charged for his Ponzi Scheme

Further, there would be an Australian scam and not the Nigerian Scam because Mr Hamilton is based in Australia (acted on behalf of EDM, MDA and AEX) and Ataneskovic Hartnell is also based in Australia (acted on behalf of AGS Capital )

The AGS received not only shares but also oppies. They sold so many oppies there are no buyer @0.001 any more