Given the known corruption of the peer review and scientific process by the corrupt charlatans involved in the climategate scandal, it is not surprising that there is a manufactured problem of a peer review that is first completed and answered, and then removed and then complaints from AGW cultists about its absence...
This "peer-review-scam" was and probably still is, one of the the MO's for this gang of AGW scammers on the AGW funding gravy train pushing their political agenda...
