friday 22nd, page-20

Once again Awesome1 you are seeking to speak for the company, by the manner inwhich you express your opinion.

I repeat again - only what the company says counts at the end of the day.

The company has in my opinion given no substantive information on this issue - yet everyone here is happy to place all their faith in reposted emails and telephone conversations with individuals.

The company made a material series of statements about listing on the NASDAQ, to now where it says nothing about the NASDAQ, only relating via vague emails and telephone discussions how the SEC would prefer there to be no discussion.

Well, emails and telephone chats don't cut it.

Using emails and telephone chats to disseminate this purported SEC restriction is a fishy way for going about providing an explanation to the market - if its OK to tell one person in an email, why not tell the whole market, hey?

A substantive announcement to the market, setting out the US securities laws provisions that the SEC is apparently relying one would be the proper corporate communication.

The market has received nothing of the sought.

The market is therefore, left in the dark, and having to rely upon second-hand information released to HC posters.

So I return to my earlier post - something is odd about all this. Something doesn't add up.

And only a proper announcement released to the market can clear matters up. If you can't understand that, well then, I'm sorry.


good luck