norway attacked, page-119

  1. 14,166 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 10
    Freewill, I think we should get more information before insinuating that any organisation to which this deranged person may have belonged is also somehow implicated.

    This guy is somebody's son - do you also implicate his parents and his family? I think it is foolish to do so until we get more information.

    IMO, the vast majority of our population representing all different political persuasions are generally law abiding people who would absolutely NOT take a gun to kill children.

    And in Australia, we usually look after each other in times of disaster regardless of political differences, so a bit rough to try and implicate others who are of a different political persuasion than yourself.

    Even if this guy is part of a group, it is still a clearly deluded minority group. It seems this is becomming an excuse for political point scoring to make anyone leaning to the right in their political views as somehow part of this evil atrocity and also dangereous. Rubbish.

    And the shooting of a politician you mention was totally unacceptable. But to take out children for political revenge - one would have to be many sandwiches short of a picnic and probably suffering from a severe mental illness.

    And, I understand, Martin Bryant was leftie. Would you like others to implicate your politics as being so dangerous they will shoot anyone? Let's get this into perspective...lol
  2. This thread is closed.

    You may not reply to this discussion at this time.

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.