prof ian frazer close to skin cancer vaccine, page-7

My previous 2 posts were moderated. I really cannot understand why, but I continue to bow to the moderators decisions and make changes to my post. Sorry moderators! You have instructed me to discuss the stock. What puzzles me though, is that the post that I am replying to does not discuss PRR and yet it has not being moderated. Why?

Anyway I will try to amend my wording to satisfy your requirements.

Boiler in a PRR thread you posted this.
"Thanks birdseye, sometimes I wonder whether it is worth the effort with the reception you receive on here at times."

Have you considered that it is possible that not everyone has the same view as you in relation to PRR. The "reception" that you refer to is from people who simply do not agree with much of what you say relating to PRR. Simple as that. It is not a personal attack, just disagreeing with content of your posts regarding PRR.

I am sure that you and many others disagree with most, if not all, that I post regarding PRR and you are perfectly entitled to do so. This is a democracy and we all can express our personal views regarding a stock such as PRR. Even if those views, on occasions, clash with the views of of others in the PRR threads.

My view in relation to PRR is that it is an extremely well managed company, with a great product which has huge potential.

Further, (you won't like this) I believe that charts are irrelevant with a stock such as this.

Your charts have been telling you that the share price has been trending down and it may go down further.

I don't need a chart to tell me this. As a result of external factors, my commonsense tell me exactly the same thing . However, my advantage over your charts is that I know something that your charts don't know. Do your charts know how fantastic PRR?s fundamentals are? I do.

All is goo with PRR.