Go for it Skint, but the latest literature survey of all climate researchers who publish peer reviewed research indicates that 97-98% of them agree with the theory of AGW (aka ACC). So maybe the climate scientists you are about to uncover - assuming they exist in numbers greater than 3% - just don't publish peer reviewed research?
"A 2010 paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States (PNAS) reviewed publication and citation data for 1,372 climate researchers and drew the following two conclusions:
(i) 97?98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Anthropogenic Climate Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and
(ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.[104]"
By the way, if you think we think this science cannot be challenged - think again. It can and should be challenged. But not by ill-informed crap.
One last thing - I don't enjoy people putting words in my mouth or mis-quoting me. Where did I say "there are no scientists against the theory"? There are clearly about 2-3% who are against it if you believe the latest survey results above. 2-3% is not zero. Or are you one of those people who says CO2 is only 394 ppm (0.03%) in the atmosphere so it must have zero effect?
