more questions, page-32

Stykes,
I am intriuged by your continued attempts to paint me as a person who has some 'agenda' against CNX.

If you bothered to read my posts you would see that they merely pose factual questions.I am intrigued by how much effort you and the other CNX guardians go to to stifle any comment about CNX that does not consist of gushing, pie-in-the-sky eruptions of optimism in circumstances in which the history of the sp speaks for itself.

Clearly your position is that unless stock is held then a person has no right to comment on a stock. That's not the way that HC works to my knowledge.

I have the same right as you do to comment on CNX as does Karma.

Through all of this Karma's questions have still not been answered. That speaks volumes about the sp.

I understand that this week a Director of CNX faces court proceedings in Queensland. On any view this must be a matetr relevant to those considering the stock. The result of the DERM charges may seriously affect CNX's ability to continue UCG in Queensland.

Is this a prohibited topic in CNX Guardian world?

I suggest that you honestly examine your conduct on this site. if the stock is as good as you say why is there a conspiracy of silence in relation to the Karma questions?

icxp