249d notice, page-38

Oh dear this turn of events scares me to death. Until now I have tried to be positive about my considerable investment in PNO. However, the idea of someone like scandal representing shareholder interests on the board is anathema to my philosophy of share dealing. I'm sorry scandal but looking through your history of postings on HC has convinced me that you are not an appropriate candidate.
Your posts flipflop, are often unintelligible, irrational and overly emotional. Your views are arrogant and verging on belligerence, especially if someone has an alternative view to yours.
I have never agreed with the pnomeeting group as a way of "guiding" PNO in its market strategies. Shareholder plebecites rarely offer anything to shareholders except a lower share price due to destruction of investor confidence. I was once told on this site that I should be grateful to this little group for generating the recent announcements, a conclusion of events I find highly unlikely. But, have you ever considered how your very public discussions could have destabalised the share price. At a time when positive announcements should produce an increase in the share price it is highly probable that potential investors have been scared away by the the public assassination of management that any small amount of internet research would have revealed. Hot Copper posts are very prominent when PNO is searched on Google - and it makes for very poor reading.
If you must continue your crusade against JP then do so between yourselves and do not undermine the confidence that could build in this potentially rewarding company.
Take your Ship of Fools and sail on safer waters where you can expect guaranteed returns. I'm sure all the pnomeeting group are already hitting the thumbs down option but I feel very strongly that your course of action is detrimental to the future prospects of MY company.
Nothing personal is intended - just stating what I see as facts.