Cheers antprojects,I apologise for been factualy correct.
Clearly your deliberately choosing not to read the "tone of my post",accusations are one thing from disgruntled former SHrs, who continualy post their greivences on this thread,formaly taking these accusations to the appropriate watchdogs is another,to beleive so strongly that a misscarriage of justice has occured and do nothing about it is just as indefencable as the deed itself IMHO.
Yes I had already seen the link that you provided.
Can I suggest theres a vast difference between snake oil and metals in the ground,while I cant cast all bios in the same category,I wouldnt touch them with a barge pole.
Given the encestuous relationship between BYR and pru,considering they share the same suite of offices along with cig( Ive already discussed them in my previous post)does anyone think that the decision to withhold the information was made alone,or in conjuction with others,particularly as pru have board representation?
Not that I need to ,but again Im defending no-one,Im suggesting less talk and more action by some former BYR SHrs,go to the appropriate agencies and seek their judgement on the matters that have been raised vis-vis the witheld information.
I reiterate,it shouldnt be that difficult to see who benefitted from the information been witheld.
I dont think I would have put my hard earned into the company had I known what is known now.
But no-one put a gun to my head and said buy,the decision was mine and I acted independantly in my actions based on the information availiable to me.
I hold based on the information availiable to me also.
Its possible,but unlikely IMHO that a corporate body such as pru will leave any evidence of misconduct,IMHO theyve been doing it for some time and got it down to a fine art.
From your own post, as if evidence was required to support my contention.
"The appropriate time for directors to sell shares is after a notice, not before the notice,"
Its a question of acting in the spirit of the law ,or to the letter of the law.
I could take you back to HDR days just before their demise as it were,Ted Ellyard resignes for health issues sells his shares in HDR and buggar me within a year, hes running three ASX listed companys,a bigger return from poor health than Lazuras.
Meanwhile since 2009 when Mansounia was first looked at for gold production the POG has risen 100 percent,the economics of this project must be getting closer given most of the JORC is inferred.
Despite a delayed start due to problems in obtaining earth-moving equipment, Burey was able to
commence and complete its planned programme of drilling at Mansounia, with 74 inclined infill,
extension and exploratory RC and 2 HQ DD holes completed. In this programme, the green fields
exploratory work accounted for 14 of the RC and the two HQ DD holes to aggregate 1,446m and
325m respectively.
The 74 hole RC drilling programme generated some 8,260 split-samples (including QA/QC samples)
for gold analysis. The two HQ diamond holes are still being logged and are expected to generate an
additional 365 samples for gold and multi-element analysis.
All RC assay samples have now been delivered to the Intertek Laboratory in Tarkwa, Ghana where
they will be assayed for gold.
Planned work program
The planning of a follow-up program on the Mansounia property awaits the return of assay results
from the recently completed drill program. It is anticipated that this additional drilling will provide
sufficient data, together with the greatly improved spot price for gold, to reconsider the proposed
development of the property which was last reviewed in 2009.
Raider
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?