Guess just have to wait for NTU report to describe more details to make a comparison.
I am fully aware of the differences. Simply trying to compare the apples with apples in each of their baskets to determine value (which will of course be heavily influenced by overall grade and revovery).
HAS: 2.102% TREO,
85% of which is HREO (1.802%)
containing 62% (53% of TREO) is Y2O3 (1.12%)
and 10% (9% of TREO) is Dy2O5 (0.186%)
NTU: looking like 2% TREO & HREO average 83% of TREO, with xenotime mineralisation containing something like
65% Y2O3
9% Dy2O5
Looks on the surface very similar for HREO
ntu ann analysis, page-10
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NTU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.0¢ |
Change
0.001(3.45%) |
Mkt cap ! $177.3M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.0¢ | 3.0¢ | 3.0¢ | $15.95K | 532.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 1352132 | 2.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0¢ | 317104 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.42pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NTU (ASX) Chart |