annual report, page-30

The timing of all of this is indisputably an exercise for directors to cover their own backsides from what now appears to be grossly inaccurate statements over the last 18 months.

They don't even have the gumpption to come out with the truth preferring to point the finger at the IER as IF that is the source of all of ESG's concerns.

If there was any good news they would've come out and said it.

Hopefully ASIC or a Class Action go after these guys. A 'NO' vote is personal wealth suicide as far as I am concerned. If you're considering voting that way I hope you're in the minority because, while I appreciate your ethical stand, we're in this to make money, not lose it hand over fist which is what will happen if the vote doesn't go through in the absence of a superior proposal.

"We've already proven the field is economic" - bahahahahahahaha.