annual report, page-35

JT,

I have the greatest respect for your posts...always have.

But I'm getting tired of putting to those who ought to know better, generally without response, DO YOU SERIOUSLY envisage STO walking away from their active investment in the ESG resource in the event that enough pissed off shareholders get a NO vote UP?

I am keeping my options open 'til the last, have consistently said so. I am not particularly interested in STO scrip, I am well covered (diversified) in other CSG & LNG areas, BUT as I said, keeping an open mind, which is to say, CONSIDER your right to vote NO as a powerful tool, very likely expected by STO, ESG and anyone else interested in the resource.

This is a b l o o d y time game as much as it is a money game, well almost, it always has been, hence why we've got sick and tired of delays, lack of comms etc.

God, Monsters must be lovin' all you blokes rolling over prepared to take what's on offer. No backbone, no fight, no sense of ownership in the real value of this resource...TO SANTOS. MAKE THEM PAY!!!!

Or have the guts to come back here and tell me, Nervous and Bundy that you believe STO will walk if we don't put up the white flag.

Forget third parties just for a moment, (tho I'm not) but for the sake of this one "vote yay or nay" argument.

STO wants the resource, NEEDS the resource. Barring an interloper, STO WILL GET the resource, will you JT, GIVE it to them, or SELL it to them?

Look forward to any measured reply. Just stick to the point.

Rgds,

Lilac