why we should be worried about arctic ice melt, page-32

That is the sort of comment that implies you are wanting to delay the transition to green energy, berretta. Just like the comment in my previous post.

See how easy it is? No effort required.

No link to any source to support your statement of 'Europe taxing Australian emissions from bushfires' (how?) or give a context or indicate how likely or imminent such a proposal would be. (Nor whether, even if Europe found a way of imposing a tax on Australia, a rebate would be given for the subsequent greening and carbon reduction, which given the ferocity of fires would in some areas take a very long time.)

You can say anything you like and deniers will approve as long as it is designed to encourage more fossil fuel pollution and hasten the damage from global warming.

Compare the effort it took to dash off that politically-motivated post (about tax policy) to the hundreds of thousands of person-years of effort that underpins the years of research done by thousands of scientists all over the world to investigate the climate, how much it is changing, what is causing it and what other damage is being done.

Yes, the EU plans to tax airlines - but I fail to see a close connection between that and toothpaste or coffee. What it does show is that governments in Europe are very aware of the need to shift away from burning fossil fuels as quickly as possible.