9/11 debunked, page-6

  1. 6,764 Posts.
    Simensen speculates that the two commercial jets were immediately trapped inside an insulating layer of building debris within the skyscrapers.

    The debris - especially plaster, which blocks the transfer of heat - would have formed a shield protecting the rest of the building.

    At the same time, however, it would created a super-hot, oven-like zone around the aircraft, heated by burning fuel.

    Aluminium alloy, which in jet hulls also contains magnesium, melts at 660C. If heated to 750C, the alloy "becomes as liquid as water", Simensen said.

    This molten aluminium could then have flowed downward through staircases and gaps in the floor, causing a chemical reaction with water from sprinklers on the levels below.

    A meltdown period of 30 to 45 minutes would be consistent with the timing of the explosions and subsequent collapse of both buildings in relation to the moment of impact.

    Simensen said there are lessons to be learned, if his theory is correct, that could help avoid a similar disaster were another skyscraper to be hit by a big jet.

    "We could develop means of rapidly emptying sprinkler systems in the floors beneath the point of impact," he said.

    Firing a rocket with fire-retardant that could coat the aircraft body could also help prevent metal alloy from melting


    ---------
    sorry still no link,this article just released on
    thewest.com.au

    lol bigdaddy, how did i know that Harry would bite lol
  2. This thread is closed.

    You may not reply to this discussion at this time.

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.