blair wins - but loses, page-22

Well your strrong position is that whilst a win (one day you'll get to say that word) that had 100 people lose their seat was something we should all roll over and slit our wrsits over

My point is - isnt it true that if one has a a reduction in your majority of say 100 seats that in fact there were only a loss of 50???

Lets put it this way - say the mix was 360 to 200. A majority of 160.

If 100 had been lost...the composition would now be 260 - 300.

Think about it