blair wins - but loses, page-30

  1. 506 Posts.
    Don

    "Just because a party is voted in it doesn't mean that its voters accept everything that party says."
    True

    "Both here and in the UK, the parties got in inspite of the fact that those who voted them in hated the Iraq war."
    Proof? You have none..

    "They were voted in because the choice was bereft of choice: Dumb and dumber are no choice; corrupt and corrupter are no choice. Liar and Pinocchio are no choice."
    Here in Australia the the Greens and the Deomcrats vehemently opposed the war. Their combine vote in the Lower House was around 10%.


    "Both got in inspite of their lies -big time lies!
    Bush got in because the yanks loved the Iraq war???
    Howard got in because the aussies love the Iraqi war?
    Blair got in because the Brits love the Iraqi war?"

    Big time lies? Conjecture on your part. No one loves war you goose. But the majority of the public do understand that it is justified in some instances.

    Try and get a grip.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.