blair wins - but loses, page-31

I'm sure you are just so happy pee brain; pro Saddam George Galloway has been elected.

This is a win for the socialist/fascist ticket that you support.

George Galloway

"Galloway has galvanised the Bengalis in the area, particularly the young ones, and we have a highly disciplined army of them under the imposing, eloquent and dedicated Abjol Miah."

"It is obvious that something huge is going on in the constituency. WeÕre constantly mobbed as we tour on our open-top bus. We stumble through to election day and, as we once more tour on the bus, it is clear that we are getting the vote out. The count is held in the Blade Runner set of Canary Wharf."

http://www.sundayherald.com/49602



http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php4?article_id=3455

Socialists have done and continue to do all in our power to build the movement to prevent war and to stop war when it starts. But if war starts the very worst outcome would be a quick victory for the US and Britain.

The best response to war would be protests across the globe which make it impossible for Bush and Blair to continue. But while war lasts by far the lesser evil would be reverses, or defeat, for the US and British forces.


Historian Walter Laqueur writes in Fascism: Past, Present, Future

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/019511793X/qid%3D1114192265/sr%3D8-1/ref%3Dsr%5F8%5Fxs%5Fap%5Fi1%5Fxgl/026-7895987-4203605

The Iraqi political system is [i.e. under Saddam] not just a military dictatorship or a one-party system. It has been striving for totalitarian rule, with a massive use of terror and propaganda, the cult of its leader, unbridled nationalism, and military aggression that have taken it as far on toward full-fledged fascism as most European fascist regimes and movements did in the 1930s.