is this the week?, page-7

The thoughts of someone with no technical expertise whatsoever.

Rather than viewing the holes as separate identities, the drilling should be looked at as Pad 1 and Pad 2.

Pad 1 is the Hole 1. The photos of Hole 1 told me nothing. So I'll leave Hole 1 out.

Pad 2 consists of holes 2, 3, 4, and 5, all drilled from the exact spot, but in direction of the compass points at a 45 degree incline. I'm not sure if this is what Karmalocust was referring to, but these results will give a loose indication of the resource contained within that pyramid structure.

Drilling four holes at one location suggests that area beneath Pad 2 must look promising, especially considering that hole 5, the fourth hole at Pad 2, was not in the original plan (I think). Also a vertical fifth drill is being considered to test the area at depth when the rigs arrive.

From what Peter saw of the cores, he stated that Holes 2 and 3 looked good.

The enterprise has impressed me because there seems to be a commitment to controlling time and costs. For this reason if Pad 2 didn't look promising, they would have moved to the next proposed hole 700 m away, regardless of the difficulty.

As others have said, it seems that Pad 2, not Hole 1, that will reveal the most.

Nothing new here, just thinking out loud. Have I got it right?

Cheers and I hope the market is kind to everyone today.