seeking ???, page-6

afternoon,

infose and recyug, both sound right to me -- however, I have been wondering for the last couple of weeks - what does it matter if they are delisted or not?
sure there is the obvious like not having the cost of a public company and having to report whenever the ceo has to go to the loo etc. ---- aside from those things does it mean anything else like - is it easier to compulsorily aquire the remaining ownership - if they aren't public. In fact can it at all be acquired compulsorily if it is a private company? If you can do it because of say a 90% rule - does it make it easier to dilute? Is it indeed possible to dilute?

Why wouldn't we dilute anyway before delisting? Then acquire after dilution?

I certainly agree with infose that the board of cre, whoever they are have a strong responsibility to the shareholders - both fml and stone (and 405 whoevers).

Thoughts?

Pinto