news out further results, page-6

Couple of points that someone with more brains than I might be able to shed some light on:

1. I get the impression that they are using uncertified standards - mentioned that they are using homemade standards (point 3 page 3) but don't state that they're certified, just "suitably tested" by independent labs. Not to mention uncertified blanks - shudder to think of what they're using for that...
2. I think that they're using cone splitting - or is the "coned" mentioned on pg 2 just for homogenisation? IF the cone relates to splitting, it has been studied and shown to be a less representative method of splitting sample
3. There has to be a reason for BLEG dissolution maybe has something to do with gangue minerals present or maybe the Italians used the same methods and BYR are trying to replicate? I couldn't find any mention of assay methods used by the Italians - has anyone seen anything?
4. Reconciliation of the different analysis techniques when calculating their intercepts would interest me, given that their cut-off appears to be 0.24ppm and their fire assay trigger is 0.5g/t. And the fact that far too much of it doesn't correlate very well...

Reckon I'm gonna have to take a hit on this one and find something else to try to waste my money on. Heart says hold and wait for a little better, head says shoulda sold in June when they got +0.10...