cudeco shareholder research, page-77

Jumpstart,

For a start, I dont see the much touted blog report as evidence of anything except that bigger traders dominate the CDU market.

Sure, many dont like the fact that big traders dominate, but its a fact of life with ASX 200.

If there was clear evidence of mis-doings, then I believe that would have been spotted when the authorities looked at the trading.

Sending the blog to pollies stating that it shows wrong doing will, in my opinion, detract from your argument, because it simply doesnt point out wrong doing.

The people that receive that stuff will shrug their shoulders and just put it to one side. If in a month you have some real evidence, they will probably ignore you as the last lot of stuff sent was considered as irrelevent.

People struggled to pen the core accusation in simple terms on this site where we all think we know more than the average pollie. How is the pollie going to get it when they see the big email?

If you had a concise accusation backed by clear and concise data, you may make some progress. A mass of tables with lots of words may look impressive, but wont even get read by most of the recipients.