Complete failure to address my post, which is that the article was written with an intent to deceive.
Do you think that if the scientists who originally published the dataset presented the evidence in this way, that it would pass muster with the scientific community?
Let's flip the graph and pretend a real climate scientist attempted to do this to demonstrate that climate change -is- occuring. There would be headlines in The Australian for months and you and your ilk would be screaming bloody murder.
