The 2 new guys (ex GBG) are needed for their experience.
Saunders and Stokes have led the company well enough imo and deserve to keep their positions and guide PDY to the development of the fe project and beyond.
Innes and Stirling should not be re-elected as PDY doesn't need more than 4 Directors. So thanks for your efforts men but its time to move on.
Ingraham and Chesson are just opportunists imo and shareholders should send them a clear message to bugger off back to YRR where they are steering the company to a record low share price and large dilution.
If AGU were to merge with PDY in the future, then Quinn should join the board of the expanded company, bringing the total number of Directors to five.
The best management team needs to be elected, not those who think its a job for life or others who see the potential PDY has and want to run it for their own purposes.
The company will only ever move forward with the help of a large financial backer. This can only happen if companies interested in PDY can see management have a clear, concise agenda. Directors, or would-be directors who see PDY as their personal meal ticket are not welcome here.
Time for a new beginning led by a strong management team. I'm of the opinion that the market will reward holders with a re-rating if the right board is elected.
PDY Price at posting:
1.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
