Yes the Indonesians did not finger print the bag and they should have as well as protecting the evidence from contimination
BUT
the point that you and every one else that keeps harping on about the fact no finger prints being taken is that Corby's finger prints not being on the bag WOULD NOT PROVE HER INNOCENCE.
It could simply mean she took precuations to prevent her finger prints being on the bag.
If there was any logic behind her getting off on this point how long do you think it would take for every drug runner to make sure they wore gloves when packing their drugs and if caught just proclaim innocence on the basis of no finger prints.
Please a bit more common sense and a bit less hysteria
