Now Schapelle is guilty of having an airhead for a mother! Yeah, I think she should be shot for that! Then it'll be your turn, Jazz cause you certainly don't like you'd have much more then luke warm air in that thick skull of yours!
I agree that the Tzunami donations with Corby's case and assistance to the needy should not be confused with the court hearing of a person. But Two non-sequitors don't make a sequitor.
You're going on suggest that Schapelle is guilty because some people want to withdraw their donations.
The reasons they are doing so are: a) because they are outraged at the unfair hearing she received and b) because they want to send a message to the Indo Govn't to lift its legal game.
The fact that she may or may not make any money out of her situation -and I hope she makes loads because of the despicable treatment she received and because of the criminal negligence her govern't, the airports and quantas had afforder her, has nothing to do with whether she's guilty or innocent. As I said earlier, if we don't know whether she is innocent or not, it's because of the way that particular court conducted itself and that is its crime, a crime far more severe than the one Schapelle may or may not have committed.
