next announcement and likely content, page-153

Itsagas, I try not too get involved directly in the ramps either up or down. We are all big kids here so research is our own responsibility.

What I don't get from certain posters is; when they have no sentiment and no stock held, why they feel the need to provide their community service of guiding us through the potential pitfalls of making a profit on a a certain stock. If they hold no stock why are they almost always negative on where the stock is heading (under a guise of looking out for us all) and if they have both no stock and no sentiment, why do they get so aggresive? I like a balanced view but it seems over the top most of the time.

Is it just attention seeking behaviour?

I would rather have debates with people who held some stock, it might mean more to the rest of us. Surely if you have made the same point over and pover and do not have any money invested you can now leave us to our own risk assessments and conversation? As investors are we not allowed our fun when things are looking rosy?

Beer o/clock, Regards