mis-leading information by cgv board, page-3

investor2009, I suspect,having been involved with a few of these kind of matters, that you'll be very surprised how little can be interpreted as "significant".

In this case I also suspect that if anyoine wanted to be bothered there is a strong case to hear. The risk profile for one thing has been changed very very significantly. And don't forget, things don't have to just get worse, merely change significantly. Anyone game?