annual general meeting, page-78

Col - that's a reasonable point - but several attended and no-one contradicted the most salient points - that the initial DFS was uneconomic (though described as positive s couple of months ago), that the expanded DFS is now not due sooner than 4 months away (what happened to 'reasonably shortly') and that the farce of a 2012 production start-up is still being talked about.

Also, the feedback that Gus and Malcolm don't seem to know where the SML is up to is a worry. Can others confirm that this was the case? How they can be confident of a 2012 start when they do not know where the SML process is up to edcapes me.