So Mt. Cattlin's loss is Jiangsu's extra gain. Makes sure no MRRT is to be paid even if it was to be extended to cover industrial minerals like spodumene. It's ONE company and a zero sum game. But you know that, don't you. So the real question is why do you bring up this comical argument anyway?
mt catlin viability, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)