australian - criterion, page-19

I am not paranoid. It is you and firsova who seem to think the company is trying to fool the market rather than taking facts at face value. But now the conspiracy extends further and they also seem to have pulled the wool over the eyes of the State of Kentucky!

Tell me Browser, as I asked firsova last night, why is the company pushing aggressively into the US if the technology isn't profitable? If as you sometimes insinuate things are not as they seem, why hasn't the company repeatedly tapped the market for more capital when they have the opportunity, and why are the options that have been granted to directors 70% out of the money (zero intrinsic value and non tradeable)?

So instead of casting snide illogical aspersions about the company's integrity at every opportunity, try and mount a coherent argument as to what you think is really going on.

The company has missed deadlines, no one here will argue with that. That is a lot different from what you are insinuating.

Put up or shut up.