the greatest fraud in the history of science, page-73

Dogby, you said:
Many people on H.C. think that if something is published on a denial blog, then it has some relevance. News flash: It doesn't. Denial bloggists 'don't know jack' (to quote denmor). Neither do shock jocks/journos like Jones and Bolt. Why do you believe them ?

Its not exactly rocket science. Get your scientific facts from reliable sources.

Are you suggesting that Bolt etc are making stuff up? Are you suggesting that those denial sites you are fond of denigrating, make their stuff up?

As for reliable sources, the facts that might be reported are one thing but how you interpret them are an entirely different matter. For example a marine scientist might find lots of dead coral, fact, but then conclude it is due to global warming. That is opinion, an interpretation of the facts reported. If that same scientist relies for his funding on a heap of money from global warming sources then what do you think he will do? It is a weakness, a human weakness. Scientists are easily corrupted as well but it is not so easily discerned.

I know MobyT has not worked as a scientist, have you actually worked as a scientist and published papers? You do not have to tell me one way or the other.