a reply to post scepticism, page-27

Bhom,

"Hi Bent, Just because Geo has only posted 3 times and been on the forum for a month doesn't make his info less credible"

Who said it did?

"Poor Geo got roasted and in my opinion it was a witch hunt the way people went after him and had the hide to ask him to justify his post."

Poor Goe? You sound like his mother.

When you post information on a public forum about the earning capacity of a share that most here are invested in and have their life savings in, dont you think people have the right to ask questions as to the authenticity of ostensibly reliable information?

Or should we just accept it? Geo chem seems intelligent enough to be able to discern the which query is credible and address it. It is in his best interest to post that information as he is invested also, so I would not be too concerned of him not posting if they have reliable and relevant information.

I wonder how many people relied on williamcfds information.
What had he had spun it in another way and people had dumped their shares (he bought in)and the price when up? How many people just trusted him?

"I am pleased many have apologized to Geo, it shows a great strength of character to do that publicly."

Are you implying that I should appologise to make him feel better?

Or are you saying I have said something innacurate?

I will not appologise for the sake of appologising.
Its that limp wristed attitude of bending over and placating people as their feelings may get hurt that is destroying the fabric of this country.

What does it matter to you that people have appologised to him? You are just being nice to him in an attempt to persuade him to keep posting information and are scared that he will run away, I highly doubt you care for his feelings.

"It's funny when the shoe is on the other foot Bent and I accuse people of being ignorant you get upset and tell me not to say it but also say that you take insults on the chin, I am confused."

I have on a number of occassions posted information regarding fracking earthquakes and from emails from the company etc and have been attacked and accussed that info was not true etc. You didnt see me calling people immmature and it unnessary as I know its an important matter so I provided the information they requested without protest or complaint.

I find it highly ironic that you accuse people on this forum for being ignorant.

Being ignorant means you lack information and knowledge.

That is the whole point of us asking these questions yet you perceive it as a negative.

Anyhow, this has all been said in previous posts above so bringing it up and rehashing it is getting very tiresome.

Lets get back to GGP and we should all QUESTION information that has the potential to influence our investment decisions.